Europa Lander Study
Which sets of technologies would provide the best science return at various budget levels?
The intriguing possibility that life-supporting conditions could exist in the ice-covered oceans of Europa makes that Jovian moon a significant priority in NASA's exploration of the solar system.
A mission to Europa to search for life would involve launching from Earth, cruising to Jupiter, achieving Europa orbit, site reconnaissance and selection, landing, deep penetration through ice, small autonomous submersibles navigating within the purported sea beneath the ice, and in-situ life detection.
Many advanced technologies not currently available would be required, including long-duration survivable systems (power, thermal, radiation), minimal-mass autonomous systems (systems-on-a-chip, autonomous safe precision landing), life detection (including preventing contamination of Europa by Earth organisms), and communication of science data from within the ocean to the ice surface, to the orbiter, and then to Earth.
We evaluated candidate technologies according to their risk, R&D costs, and probable science return, and used a decision tree methodology to rank them. The results appear in the table below, with the technologies that offer the most value per dollar listed at the top.
Europa Lander Technologies Considered & Their Metrics
| Technology |
Metric |
| Deep Ice Penetration |
km |
| Excellent Life Detection |
kg |
| Extended Survivability |
years |
| Autonomous Hardware |
#dig ops/W-square cm |
| High Volume COMM |
kbs |
| Thermal Control System Hardware |
kg |
| Sub-sea Mobility |
kg |
| No Sub-sea Mobility |
|
| Radiation Shielding |
kg |
| Multifunctional Structure |
|
| Stirling Engine; Specific Power |
W/kg |
| Batteries |
W-hr/kg |
| AMTEC; Specific Power |
W/kg |
| Adv. Propulsion (SEP); Isp |
N/kg |
| Adv. Propulsion (Liquid); Specific Thrust |
N/kg |
| Segmented Thermoelectrics; Specific Power |
W/kg |
| System on a Chip |
#dig ops/W-square cm |
| High Data Rate COMM; |
BPS/W-gram |
|
Technology Portfolio Options for Various Budget Levels
Budget is listed in the first column, and actual total cost of each set of technologies is in the second column. The third column indicates how much value a mission consisting of that technology set would provide out of a possible total of 100%. The fourth column shows how many orders of magnitude improvement over the current state-of-the-art is represented by each technology set.
Budget ($M) |
Cost ($M) |
(%) Gain of Maximum |
Factor Gain Orders of Magnitude |
TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO |
| 10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
None |
| 20 |
20 |
18.8 |
5.6 |
Extended Survivability |
| 30 |
29 |
23.2 |
6.9 |
Autonomous Hardware; High Volume COMM |
| 40 |
35 |
32.2 |
9.6 |
Deep Ice Penetration |
| 50 |
49 |
42.3 |
12.6 |
Extended Survivability; Autonomous Hardware; High Volume COMM |
| 60 |
55 |
51.3 |
15.3 |
Deep Ice Penetration; Extended Survivability |
| 70 |
70 |
63.4 |
18.9 |
Deep Ice Penetration; Extended Survivability; Autonomous Hardware |
| 80 |
81 |
65.8 |
19.6 |
Deep Ice Penetration; Extended Survivability; High Volume COMM; High Data Rate COMM |
| 90 |
85 |
67.4 |
20.1 |
Deep Ice Penetration; Extended Survivability; Autonomous Hardware Thermal Control |
| 100 |
96 |
77.8 |
23.2 |
Deep Ice Penetration; Extended Survivability; Autonomous Hardware; High Volume COMM; High Data Rate COMM |
| 110 |
109 |
80.2 |
23.9 |
Deep Ice Penetration; Extended Survivability; Excellent Life Detection; High Volume COMM |
| 120 |
121 |
83.7 |
24.93 |
Deep Ice Penetration; Extended Survivability; Excellent Life Detection; High Volume COMM; High Data Rate COMM |
| 130 |
125 |
85.2 |
25.4 |
Deep Ice Penetration; Extended Survivability; Excellent Life Detection; Autonomous Hardware; Thermal Control |
| 140 |
139 |
96.6 |
28.8 |
Deep Ice Penetration; Extended Survivability; Excellent Life Detection; Autonomous Hardware; High Volume COMM; Thermal Control |
| 150 |
151 |
100 |
29.8 |
Deep Ice Penetration; Extended Survivability; Excellent Life Detection; Autonomous Hardware; High Volume COMM; Thermal Control; High Data Rate COMM |
|
For more information, contact:
Charles.R.Weisbin@jpl.nasa.gov
Or see the following:
- "Decision Tree Assessment of Challenging Technologies for a Mission to Europa," (R. Manvi, W. Zimmerman, G. Rodriguez), Journal of Aerospace Engineering, July 2003, pages 1-8.